Skip to main content
Community Decision Making

Governance

Democratic, transparent, and community-driven governance ensuring local ownership and sustainable impact.

Governance Overview
A hybrid governance model combining blockchain technology with traditional community structures

Tana Token's governance system empowers local communities to make decisions about their resources while leveraging blockchain technology for transparency and accountability. The system balances democratic participation with efficient decision-making.

Community DAO

Local decision-making body

Impact Council

Technical oversight and verification

Token Holders

Ecosystem-wide governance

Community DAO Structure

Membership Requirements

  • • Minimum 100 TANA tokens
  • • Verified community member status
  • • Completed impact contribution
  • • Local residency verification

Voting Power

  • • Base vote: 1 per verified member
  • • Token weight: 1 vote per 1000 TANA
  • • Impact multiplier: Up to 2x for contributions
  • • Maximum individual power: 5% of total
Impact Council

Composition

  • • 5 technical experts
  • • 3 community representatives
  • • 2 environmental scientists
  • • 2 social impact specialists

Responsibilities

  • • Verify impact measurements
  • • Review project proposals
  • • Ensure technical standards
  • • Resolve disputes
Proposal Process
Step-by-step process for community proposals and decision-making
1

Proposal Submission

Any community member with 50+ TANA can submit a proposal with detailed impact projections

2

Technical Review (7 days)

Impact Council reviews feasibility, environmental impact, and technical requirements

3

Community Discussion (14 days)

Open forum for community feedback, questions, and proposal refinements

4

Voting Period (7 days)

Community DAO votes with 60% approval threshold and 25% participation minimum

5

Implementation

Approved proposals receive funding and begin implementation with milestone tracking

Governance Rights
  • Project Funding: Vote on which community projects receive TANA funding
  • Resource Allocation: Decide how community resources are distributed
  • Policy Changes: Modify governance rules and community guidelines
  • Impact Standards: Set criteria for measuring and verifying impact
  • Partnership Approval: Approve strategic partnerships and integrations
Safeguards & Checks
  • Veto Power: Impact Council can veto proposals that violate environmental standards
  • Quorum Requirements: Minimum participation thresholds for valid votes
  • Time Delays: 48-hour delay before major changes take effect
  • Emergency Pause: Multi-signature emergency stop for critical issues
  • Appeal Process: Formal process for challenging governance decisions
Current Governance Metrics
Live statistics from the Tana Token governance system
1,247
Active Voters
23
Active Proposals
89%
Average Participation
156
Implemented Projects